Mens Health?

Whoa!...that's a new one!.....But if it works for you both then so be it....I'm nobody's judge, and good for you.

You might want to edit that post though....looks like your kids aren't interested in sex with you.....

 

Good point made in post 40 IMHO.

 

I'd say go for it mate. If she's willing to cheat then her husband deserves better and maybe cheating is the only way she'll actually end it.

I hope, for your sake, you don't see her as anything more than a fling? Once a cheat, always a cheat in my opinion... I've never cheated and never would. There's more to life and having someone that cares is more important...

 

My Mother critiqued a woman in our town that had an affair causing her marriage break up, who then went on to remarry, her comment was "if one mans not enough, 20 isn't too many." Strangely she was the Mother of one of my boyhood friends and she was a lovely lady, old style values on my Mums part I guess. :roll:

 

But we're all different. Perhaps some people may be just be unfaithful until they meet the right person, then never want to stray again.?
We are all live by different moral codes. However underneath all our dressing we are all merely animals & nature has programmed us with some unusual quirks when it comes to how we conduct ourselves in relationships.

 

On the face of it (ie with no further facts) I think the woman considering being unfaithful is of course the most guilty party here by a considerable margin. But that does not completely exonerate the OP from any responsibility. I'm no saint, but rather than taking sexual advantage of the woman's situation, the OP if he were a true friend would counsel her about her marriage - if she decides she finish it then its fair game. But until that point, just exploiting the woman's predicament, is shallow and selfish.

I do not accept the defence that if she wasn't unfaithful with him, then she would be with someone else - and therefore his conscience is clear. The same argument can be applied to a gun shop owner who knowingly sells a gun to a murderer to make a quick buck, on the basis that if the murderer didn't buy from him he'd be able to just go down the road to another gun store.

I also do not accept the argument that people are just different with different moral codes and behaviour and we should all just be tolerant. That's no logical justification for excusing immoral behaviour in my book.

In summary, my view is:
don't cheat on your partner
don't cheat on anyone else's partner

 

OP: In results, no difference bar a thumping head ache for 5 hours. Plus £4 in the shops, £3 from the vending machine.

 

Ow well I suppose
I hope you went ahead and did it, you are a man ffs, if she is fit then why not.
My rules are dont screw over family or friends but anyone else is game.
Or have all morals in the world and sit at home playing with yourself lol

 

I believe I understand your line of thinking, Mukka.

But fwiw I was not intending to propose justification. I was merely pointing out that (despite the high ethical standards obviously held by a good number of forum members) it is nonetheless a fact that such morals are not exclusive.
I am sure that in a more perfect world we would all be inherently graced with morals that ensured we conducted ourselves to the highest ethical standards. However the world we live in is far from perfect, as you personally know only too well.



Perhaps we should “take a leaf”, and propose stoning the pair of them to death .?

 

Funny how this went from a question on whether the OP's boner was going to persist to a bible-proportioned discussion on relative morality. Good to know we have so many people on here that have never done anything wrong in their whole life.

 

good to know people will only call someone a c@nt in a "confessions box" too

cant stand this part of the forum, please close it down, dont think it's ever been used for what it was supposedly intended for

cheers

red 675

 

I was being ironic when I made the statement about stoning, sorry if that wasn't immediately obvious.

 

What if the persons partner was unable to fitful that part of the marriage due to health grounds, would we expect the partner to 'go without' just because the chosen partner was unable? I'd personally say no, if there happy, it's not harming anyone.
As above, the OP thread was a question of has anyone tried this freely available pill, not a question of morals.
Best get back off of my box now.

Maybe a Mod would like to lock this topic or move it, I believe the OP question has been answered, no one bar the OP has tried it/them.

 

Lock not lick!

 

And we all thought you started the thread :?

 

#5 is my first contribution. You can usually tell cos my posts tend to be littered with foul language or the word m25.

Or both.

 

I didn't like use of the C word. There are only two words that personally I can't stand, the C word is one. Interesting exchange of views on here. Ed